I wanted to add some definition comments to an ontology I'm building today. I like to follow standards as much as possible and I remember BFO has a specific standard for how to describe classes and I think other entities. I tried looking through the BFO book and manual I have but I'm impatient and when I couldn't find it right away I tried Google. That didn't work either so I tried ChatGPT. That didn't work either but it was closer.
Then I remembered seeing a new feature of a Wizard to create intelligent assistants on the Open AI developer page. So I created an assistant and fed it the Building Systems with BFO book and the BFO specification. It was very easy. Of course at this point I was also finding more interesting things to do than write documentation.
I asked the BFO Assistant "What is the appropriate format for writing definition comments in BFO?" That didn't work either. I mean it was actually a good answer but not exactly what I was looking for. See below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/681da/681da78f190436b534db233c19ddc7a63d97b7af" alt=""
I refined my question a bit with an example from my best recollection of what the standard was and that worked! I got exactly the information I was looking for:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74b87/74b87a1b4f549925d14bc162f79ff1e684fe9933" alt=""
Given the above and your general interest, might be interesting looking at LM-ontology-concept-placement, which on its turn relies on DeepOnto. https://github.com/KRR-Oxford/LM-ontology-concept-placement
Arguably, lions do not just live in the jungle: https://www.ourendangeredworld.com/do-lions-live-in-the-jungle/
I like the idea of specialty chatbots. I'm definitely using different models and personalities as my needs evolve.